Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of Computed  Tomography in Headache Patients in Benghazi

Hawa M. Hawla; Faisal M. Shembesh; Mohammed Buzgheia; Ossama El-faitory; Murshed H. Haidar; Ibrahim M. M. Elomami; Mustafa A. Karwad; Narges M. Elzaidi; Azza El Saddiek Greiw

doi:10.54172/mjsc.v38i2.1017

Authors

Hawa M. Hawla Department of radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Faisal M. Shembesh Department of radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Mohammed Buzgheia Department of radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Ossama El-faitory Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Murshed H. Haidar Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Ibrahim M. M. Elomami Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Mustafa A. Karwad Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya.
Narges M. Elzaidi Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya
Azza El Saddiek Greiw Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v38i2.1017

Keywords:

Computed Tomography, Headache, Abnormalities, Para-Nasal Sinus

Abstract

Headache is the most common complaint faced by physicians. Referring these cases for a computed tomography (CT) scan requires awareness of red flags in the history and examination by physicians. An assessment of the diagnostic utility of CT among headache patients will help determine the most prevalent causes of headache and identify those who get benefit from it. is to find out the proportion of cranial abnormalities in patients with headache without neurologic abnormalities with the use of a CT scan. Also, to illustrate the most common causes of headache in these patients. This study was carried out among 217 patients with isolated headache who underwent a plain, non-contrast enhanced CT of the brain and para-nasal sinus (PNS).The median age was 34 years. The most prevalent age group was between 20 and 39 years old. The most common cases were females. The female to male ratio was 1.5:1. The most frequently occurring cases in 2012 came from the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department. The paranasal sinuses (PNS) scan was used by 58.53%, and the brain scan was used by 41.47%. The normal scan was 55.3% and the positive scan was 44.7%, which was further categorized into minor incidental findings (17.97%) and significant abnormalities (26.73%).Abnormal findings represent 44.7% of cases. The most common major abnormality was sinusitis. An equal proportion (3.45%) of major abnormalities included sino-nasal polyposis, chronic small-vessel ischemic changes, a suspicious brain tumor, and a suspicious nasopharyngeal mass.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A., Khan, P., Ahmad, K., & Syed, A. (2008). Diagnostic outcome of patients presenting with severe thunderclap headache at Saidu Teaching Hospital. Pakistan J Med Sci, 24, 575-580.

Buljčik-Čupić, M. M., & Savović, S. N. (2007). Endonasal endoscopy and computerized tomography in diagnosis of the middle nasal meatus pathology. Medicinski pregled, 60(7-8), 327-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS0708327B

Clinch, C. R. (2001). Evaluation of acute headaches in adults. American family physician, 63(4), 685.

Dumas, M., Pexman, J., & Kreeft, J. (1995). Computed-Tomography Evaluation of Patients With Chronic Headache (Vol 151, Pg 1447, 1994) (Vol. 152, pp. 158-158): Canadian Medical Association 1867 Alta Vista Dr, Ottawa On K1g 3y6, Canada.

Edlow, J. A., Panagos, P. D., Godwin, S. A., Thomas, T. L., & Decker, W. W. (2008). Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Headache. Annals of emergency medicine, 52(4), 407-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.001

Garvey, C. J., & Hanlon, R. (2002). Computed tomography in clinical practice. Bmj, 324(7345), 1077-1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1077

Grosskreutz, S. R., Osborn, R. E., & Sanchez, R. M. (1991). Computed tomography of the brain in the evaluation of the headache patient. Military medicine, 156(3), 137-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/156.3.137

Gupta, S. N., & Belay, B. (2008). Intracranial incidental findings on brain MR images in a pediatric neurology practice: a retrospective study. Journal of the neurological sciences, 264(1-2), 34-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.055

Lateef, T. M., Grewal, M., McClintock, W., Chamberlain, J., Kaulas, H., & Nelson, K. B. (2009). Headache in young children in the emergency department: use of computed tomography. Pediatrics, 124(1), e12-e17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3150

Lemmens, C. M., Van der Linden, M. C., & Jellema, K. (2021). The value of cranial CT imaging in patients with headache at the emergency department. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 663353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.663353

Morgenstein, K. M., & Krieger, M. K. (1980). Experiences in middle turbinectomy. The Laryngoscope, 90(10), 1596-1603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198010000-00002

Morgenstern, L. B., Huber, J. C., Luna‐Gonzales, H., Saldin, K. R., Grotta, J. C., Shaw, S. G., Knudson, L., & Frankowski, R. F. (2001). Headache in the emergency department. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 41(6), 537-541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006537.x

Practice parameter: the utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of headache in patients with normal neurological examinations (summary statement) (1994). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 44:1353-1354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.7.1353

Perkins, A. T., & Ondo, W. (1995). When to worry about headache: Head pain as a clue to intracranial disease. Postgraduate medicine, 98(2), 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1995.11946038

Rho, Y. I., Chung, H. J., Suh, E. S., Lee, K. H., Eun, B. L., Nam, S. O., Kim, W. S., Eun, S. H., & Kim, Y. O. (2011). The role of neuroimaging in children and adolescents with recurrent headaches–multicenter study. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 51(3), 403-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01845.x

Sempere, A., Porta-Etessam, J., Medrano, V., Garcia-Morales, I., Concepción, L., Ramos, A., Florencio, I., Bermejo, F., & Botella, C. (2005). Neuroimaging in the evaluation of patients with non-acute headache. Cephalalgia, 25(1), 30-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00798.x

Stovner, L., Hagen, K., Jensen, R., Katsarava, Z., Lipton, R., Scher, A., Steiner, T., & Zwart, J. (2007). The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia, 27(3), 193-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x

Stovner, L. J., & Andree, C. (2010). Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. The journal of headache and pain, 11(4), 289-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0217-0

Tentschert, S., Wimmer, R., Greisenegger, S., Lang, W., & Lalouschek, W. (2005). Headache at stroke onset in 2196 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke, 36(2), e1-e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000151360.03567.2b

Tsushima, Y., & Endo, K. (2005). MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic or recurrent headache. Radiology, 235(2), 575-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352032121

Vazquez‐Barquero, A., Ibanez, F., Herrera, S., Izquierdo, J., Berciano, J., & Pascual, J. (1994). Isolated headache as the presenting clinical manifestation of intracranial tumors: a prospective study. Cephalalgia, 14(4), 270-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1404270.x