The differences study between wild and aquaculture gilthead sea bream Spams aurata L. 1758. II: The biochemical differences between wild and aquaculture gilthead sea bream.

Authors

  • Hussain A. Al-saady Al-saady Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Al-Bayda - Libya
  • Refaat G. Abu Elela Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Al-Bayda - Libya
  • Haneen M. Ali Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Al-Bayda - Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v23i1.352

Abstract

The current study was carried out to evaluate the effect of environmental stress on gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata L during the domestication period in marine aquaculture.

The biochemical study with 12.5% SDS - PAGE of gills and cardiac muscle proteins of wild and aquaculture individuals showed that they differed in 12 protein bands form the gills and in six protein bands form the cardiac muscle. Six protein bands (79, 83, 87, 89, 98 and 125 KDa) are characteristic of wild fish gills, while six other protein bands (78, 81, 85, 88, 95 and 104) are characteristic of aquaculture fish gills. In addition, three protein bands are characteristic of wild fish heart (17, 30 and 66 KDa) while three other protein bands (55, 71 and 76 KDa) are characteristic of aquaculture heart.

The coefficient of similarity between wild and aquaculture gilthead sea bream are 0.892 and 0.889 for gills and heart respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ألساعدي، حسين علي مهوس؛ ابو العلا، رفعت غريب و العبيدي، حتين معيوف علي(2008 ؛). دراسة الاختلافات بين سمكة القاحوج 1758 .Sparus aurata L البحرية والمزرعية. 1: دراسة الاختلافات المظهرية بين سمكة القاجوج البحرية والمزرعية. مقبول للنشر، مجلة المختار للعلوم.

ألساعدي، حسين علي مهوس؛ أبوالعلا، رفعت غريب؛ السعدي، علي حمود والعبيدي، حتين معيوف علي

(2008 ب). دراسة الاختلافات بين سمكة القاحوج 1758.Sparus aurata L البحريةوالمزرعية.3: دراسة الاختلافات الجزيئية بين سمكة القاجوج البحرية والمزرعية. مقبول للنشر، مجلة المختار للعلوم.

محمود، عبد الباري محمد (1998). الاستزراع السمكي المكثف. منشأة المعارف. الإسكندرية.

Allendorf, F. w. and Leary, R. F. (1986). Heterozygosity and Fitness in Natural Populations of Animals. In: Soule, M. E. (ed.) Conservation Biology Associates. Massachusetts, pp 57-76.

Baptist, j. N.; Shaw, c. R.; and Mandel M. (1969). Zone electrophoresis of enzymes in bacterial taxonomy, j. Bacteriol., 99: 180-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.99.1.180-188.1969

Barnhart, R. A. (1969). Effects of certain variables on hematological characteristics of rainbow trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 98: 411-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1969)98[411:EOCVOH]2.0.CO;2

Barton, B. A. (2002). Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integ. Comp. Biol., 42: 517- 525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.3.517

Barton, B. A. and Iwama, G. K. (1991). Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Ann. Rev, Fish Dis.,17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8030(91)90019-G

Basaglia, F. (1992). Comparative examination of soluble red muscle protein of fifteen Sparidae species. j. fish. Biol., 40: 557-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02605.x

Basaglia, F. and Marchetti, M. G. (1990). A comparative stady of some soluble proteins of genus Diplodus (Sparidae: Teleostei). Comp. Biochem Physiol.,666. ٠ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(90)90300-I

Bauchot, M. and Hureau, j. (1990). Sparidae. In: Quero. j. c.١ Hureau, j. c., Katter, c.. Post, A. and Saldanha, L. (ed.). Check-List ofThe Fishes ofThe Eastern Tropical Atlantic (CLOFETA). JNICT, Lisbon; SEL Paris and UNESCO, Paris, pp 790-812..

Bioch.gen, (BiochemicesKaja genetika ryb) (1973). Material 1.

vessojuznogo sovieSCania, Leningrad 1973, Izd Institut citologii Akademii Nauk SSSR- Leningrad..

Boerlin, p.; Rocourt, j. and Piffaretti, j. c. (1991).Taxonomy ofthe genus Listeria by using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Int. j. Syst. Bacteriol., 41: 59-64.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-41-1-59

Borenstein E. and Krakauer D. c. (2008). An end to endless forms: Epistasis, phenotype distribution bias, and iron-uniform evolution. PLoS Computational.4:1-13,.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000202

Brouk, G. R. and Ball, R. c. (1968). Conrparative electrophoretic patterns of lactate dehydrogenase in three species oftrout. J.fish. Res. Bd. Can., 25: 13-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/f68-118

Buffon, j. G. (1987). Principles of Immunochemical Techniques. In: Tieiz, N w. (ed.) Fundamitation ofClinical Chemistry .325 ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, ppl45-159.

Chen, F. Y. and Tsuyuki, H. (1970). Zone electrophoretic studies on the proteins of Tialapia mossambica & T. hornarum and , T. zillii awd T. melanopleura. j. fish. Res. Bd. Can.,206'. 2161.

Crozler W.W. (2000). Esca d fanned salmon Salmoscdar L. in the GlenmRiver, Northern Ireland: genetic status of tire wild population 7 veare on. Fish. Mariag. Ecol., 7: 437-446.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2000.00219.x

Published

2009-08-31

How to Cite

Al-saady, H. A. A.- saady, Abu Elela, . R. G. ., & Ali, . H. M. . (2009). The differences study between wild and aquaculture gilthead sea bream Spams aurata L. 1758. II: The biochemical differences between wild and aquaculture gilthead sea bream. Al-Mukhtar Journal of Sciences, 23(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v23i1.352

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories