Comparison between milk constituents of local goat strain and some imported strains rearing under El-Jabel Al-Akhdar conditions

Authors

  • S.A. Amazik Department of Animal production - Faculty of Agriculture, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya
  • M. H. El-Jarari Department of Animal production - Faculty of Agriculture, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v21i1.762

Abstract

This experiment was carried out in El-Beida and Darna regions using local , Aspain and Shami goats to study milk composition in these strains.

Samples of local goat's milk were obtained from local farms two times a year in El-Beida and Darna regions during January and March 2007. Similarly, samples of Aspain and Shami milk were obtained from El-Kideda farm in El-Marj, El-Jabel Al-Akhdar region. Samples were obtained by manual milking two times per day.

The obtained results indicated that in El-Beida region, the moisture content as % was increased by 1% in January than March in local goat, while fat % was highly significant increased (P<0.01) during March than January.

Also, there was a highly significant difference in moisture contents % in local goat milk in El-Beida region than that in Darna region (86.96 vs. 84.54%) respectively.

In general, milk composition in local goats in Darna region did not differ significantly due to the time of collection samples. At the same time, the total solids % were significantly differenent (P<0.05) in March than January. There were no significant differences between local and imported goats in their protein, lactose, specific gravity %, where the fat content was significantly different (P<0.05) in Spain goat than local goat milk (4.70 vs. 4.56%), respectively. while there were a insignificant differences between Shami and local goats.

From this study, it could be concluded that Shami and Spain goats were highly adapted under Al-Jabel Al-Akhdar region and showed a partially increasing in milk composition than local goats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

القس ، ج. ا. و عبدا لرازق ، م. ج. (1982) . "تربية الماعز" . جامعة بغداد . طبعة بمطابع جامعة الموصل .

درويش ، م. ى. (1977) . "تربية ورعاية وإنتاج الحيوان الزراعي" كلية الزراعة جامعة كفر الشيخ جامعة طنطا . دار النشر مكتبة الأنجلو المصرية .

شريحة ، ع. و غادري ، غ. (2001) . "الماعز في الوطن العربي" جامعة الفاتح "الطبعة الثانية . دار النشر جامعة الفاتح .

A.O.A.C. (1990). Official methods of analysis. 15rd ed. Association of Analysis Chemists. Washington D.C., USA.

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F Tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

FAO (1978). Food and Agriculture Organization "Production Yearbook". Rome. Italy.

Hadjipanyietou, M and A. Koumas (1991). Effect of protein source on performance of lactating Damascus goat. Small Rumin. Res. 5:319-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(91)90069-3

Keskin, M.; Avsar, Y.K. and O. Bicer, (2004). A comparative study on the milk yield and milk composition of two different goat genotypes under the climate of the Eastern Meditrranean. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 28:531-536.

SAS, (1990). SAS/STAT." Guide for personal comport" SAS, Inst., Inc, Cary,N.C., USA.

Wilkinson, J.M. and Stark, B. A., (1987). Commercial Goat Production. BSP Professional books. First edition. V&M Graphics Ltd UK.

Published

2008-12-31

How to Cite

Amazik, S., & El-Jarari, M. H. (2008). Comparison between milk constituents of local goat strain and some imported strains rearing under El-Jabel Al-Akhdar conditions. Al-Mukhtar Journal of Sciences, 21(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.54172/mjsc.v21i1.762

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories